It's true that jets can move faster but in the best condition if you want to kill the conyard with jets, you'll need at least 7200$(funds needed for 6 black eagles) while you'll only need 2000$ for a kirov.jets are fast and thats the only thing that makes them superior to kirovs. Ok here let me explain about the things that you mentioned why allieds are better than soviets:ġ.yes, harriers/black eagles are cheaper than kirov and also faster but how much you need to invest economy on jets to get MCV and how much for kirov? If a player is playing a certain faction in a very decent level, it doesn't mean the faction is op or it's better than the other factions.(sure there are some features that we can argue about them like sov>korea/america and yuri > sov but saying allied > sov is non sense imo in both games) Ok you think allieds are superior to sovs? the thing you're talking about is just against what people have been arguing about in the past 17 years(sovs > allieds)įirst of all, you have to agree on the fact that sov = tough straight fighting and allied = hit and run(early game) and mixture(late game and tech) rockies, harriers, and prism tanks can out maneuver the soviet units.
yes soviets are strong but are quite static and cannot move fast (appocalypse + airship). All of the above makes the allies capable of out maneuvering the soviets. This make re-arrangment and retreat much easier. Yes apocalypse is good but cannot attack from afar.Ĭhrono miner can teleport to any refinery. Their airship carrier can defend itself much better than Dreadnought Their naval units can invade lands and clear the shores to help deploying troops from transports. Imo the gab generator should have been for the soviets to balance the spy satelite. They have superior vision and map control with both spy satellite and gap generator. Construction yard can be easily killed with couple of Allied radars. Here are the reasons:Īir planes are much faster than soviet Kirov airship.
It seems to me that allies are much more powerful than the soviets are.
0 kommentar(er)
